The High Court of Rajasthan deemed CWP 14281/12 disposed of based on a coordinate bench order directing respondents to declare the petition result within 15 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP 14281/12
1
I N THE HI GH COURT OF JUDI CATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAI PUR.
S. B. Ci vi l Wr i t Pet i t i on No. 14281/ 12 Har i om Meena & Or s. Vs. Uni ver si t y of Raj ast han & Anot her
DATE OF ORDER : 2. 11. 2012
HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE AJAY RASTOGI
Mr . DP Shar ma, f or pet i t i oner s. Mr . Ar un Shar ma, Mr . PS Tomar f or Mr . RA Kat t a, f or r espondent s.
Counsel f or pet i t i oner s submi t s t hat t he quest i on r ai sed i n t he i nst ant pet i t i on has been exami ned and deci ded by t he Coor di nat e Bench of t hi s Cour t vi de or der dt . 8. 8. 2012 passed i n CWP10487/ 2012 t her eby obser vi ng and di r ect i ng ad i nf r a: -
“ Looki ng t o t he subj ect mat t er of t hese wr i t pet i t i ons and t he or der passed i n t he case of Phool Si ngh ( supr a) , i t i s deemed pr oper t hat t he r espondent s be di r ect ed t o decl ar e t he r esul t of t he pet i t i oner wi t hi n f i f t een days f r om t oday. However , r espondent no. 1 shal l be f r ee t o t ake st eps, as avai l abl e t o t hem f or r ecover y of t he amount due agai nst r espondent no. 2. ”
I n t he l i ght of t he or der passed by t he Coor di nat e Bench ( supr a) , i nst ant wr i t pet i t i on st ands di sposed of and t he r espondent s ar e
CWP 14281/12
2
di r ect ed t o decl ar e r esul t of t he pet i t i oner s wi t hi n f i f t een days f r om t oday. However , i t wi l l not pr ecl ude t he r espondent s f r om t aki ng st eps f or r ecover y of t he al l eged due amount f r om t he r espondent no. 2 i n accor dance wi t h l aw.
DSR
"All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed"
Datar Singh P.S.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Phool SinghReferred¶9
CWP 10487/2012 dt. 8.8.2012
Hari om Meena & Ors
University of Rajasthan & Another
AJAY RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
