Shri Pradeep Kalwania, learned Additional Government Counsel submits that in the notification u/s.4 and 6 of the Act not only the name of father/predecessor in title of the petitioner was correctly described at S No. .17, but measurement of their land was also correctly given as 3 bighas and 14 biswas.. However, it so happened because the khasra no.80 was mentioned at two places at .S No.7 with reference to khatedari of that land namely Gilya whereas measurement of that land at .S No.7 was indicated to be only 1 biswas. At S No. .17, the name of father/ predecessor in title of petitioner was correctly described and measurement was also correctly mentioned, but khasra number was wrongly mentioned as 80 instead of 90. Petitioners cannot be said to have prejudiced by this mistake because petitioners on their own made an application before the Land Acquisition Officer on 1.10.2003 wherein specific prayer was made by them that compensation of the land of khasra no.90 be paid . to them Their application was decided by detailed order on 30.10.2003 and eventually when the award was passed, this issue was taken care of by the Land Acquisition Officer in para 17 thereof. Moreover, the premises of the Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti building was . accordingly constructed on that land On hearing the learned counsel for the parties and perusing the material on record, I find that an application made by the petitioners on 1.10.2003, which is on record. In that application, petitioners rather than objecting to acquisition of their land mentioned that
