Ram Swaroop v. State of Raj and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
//1// In the High Court of Judicature for…
What did the court decide?
petition dismissed as petitioner had already retired rendering the petition infructuous.
//1// In the High Court of Judicature for…
petition dismissed as petitioner had already retired rendering the petition infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CW 4744/09
//1//
In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench **
Civil Writ Petition No.4744/2009 Ram Swaroop Versus State & Ors
Date of Order ::: 05/05/2011
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi
Mr. Inderjeet Singh for Mr. Ashok Bansal, for petitioner Mr. Ganesh Meena, Govt. Counsel for respondent State Mr. MF Baig, Dy. Govt. Counsel for respondents
Counsel submits that petitioner has retired from service pendente instant petition and accordingly instant petition has become infructuous. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as prayed for.
( Ajay Rastogi), J.
K.Khatri/p1/
4744CW2009May5RtrdSuspInfrDs.doc
Ram Swaroop
State
Ajay Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court