The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur dismissed an appeal by Aditya Cement, holding the matter covered by a prior judgment in Hindustan Zinc Limited and applying the same reasoning.
The appeal is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR --------------------------------------------------------
CENTR.EXCISE APPEAL No. 8 of 2008
ADITYA CEMENT V/S COMMISSIONER C.E.JAIPUR II & ANR.
Mr. BC MEHTA, for the appellant / petitioner
Date of Order : 7.3.2008
HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE SHRI MANAK MOHTA,J.
ORDER -----
The controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court dt. 28.5.2007 passed in D.B. Central Excise Appeal No. 33/2007 Hindustan Zinc Limited Vs. Commissioner, Central Excise. In that view of the matter, for the same reasons this appeal is also dismissed.
( MANAK MOHTA ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J.
/sushil/
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Hindustan Zinc Limited Vs. Commissioner, Central ExciseFollowed¶8
D.B. Central Excise Appeal No. 33/2007 Hindustan Zinc Limited Vs. Commissioner, Central Excise
ADITYA CEMENT
COMMISSIONER C.E.JAIPUR II & ANR.
N P GUPTA
MANAK MOHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
