The pet i t i oner has chal l enged t he or der dat ed 21. 09. 2007, wher eby t he phot o st at e copy of t he sur vey r epor t pr epar ed by Bl ock El ect i on Of f i cer wi t h r egar d t o t he ver i f i cat i on of t hi r d chi l d i nt o t he f ami l y of t he el ect ed Sar panch No. 2 has been r ef used t o t aken on r ecor d by t he t r i al cour t . I n t hi s r egar d, t he l ear ned counsel f or t he pet i t i oner ar gued t hat dur i ng t he cour se of ar gument s on t hat appl i cat i on, t he pet i t i oner pr oduced at t est ed copy of sur vey r epor t and i t was t he mat t er of evi dence as t o who pr epar ed t hat r epor t . Havi ng per used t he i mpugned or der , I f i nd t hat t he mat t er per t ai ns t o an el ect i on pet i t i on whi ch was f i l ed i n Febr uar y 2005 and t he pet i t i oner cannot be per mi t t ed t o pr oduce at t hi s st age copy of t he sur vey r epor t , whi ch obvi ousl y r equi r e f ur t her evi dence i n t he mat t er . The l ear ned t r i al cour t r i ght l y al l owed pr oduct i on of t he sur vey r epor t on r ecor d. Quest i on whet her t hi r d chi l d was bor n i nt o t he f ami l y of el ect ed Sar panch Har i Si ngh i s a quest i on whi ch can be pr oved or di spr oved by evi dence l et by t he par t i es. Sur vey r epor t pr epar ed by t he Bl ock Educat i on Of f i cer cannot be i n case pr oof of exact dat e of bi r t h as i t i s based near l y on sur vey.