Acto, Anti Evasion, Ct.,Doongarpur v. M/S Godrej G.E.Appliances Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Revisions under Section 78 of the Act challenging penalty liability were allowed. Impugned orders of Tax Board and Dy. Commissioner (Appeals) were set aside. Matters remanded to Dy. Commissioner (Appeals) to decide afresh following principles in the Dev Trading Co. case.
What did the court decide?
Impugned orders of the learned Tax Board and Dy. Commissioner (Appeals) set aside; matters remanded to Dy. Commissioner (Appeals) to decide afresh.