Kajal Singh v. Vikram Singh Sahota
Case brief
What is this about?
Transfer application withdrawn by the applicant's counsel at the hearing; the court dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Transfer application withdrawn by the applicant's counsel at the hearing; the court dismissed the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.105
TA-937-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.01.2026
KAJAL SINGH
....Applicant
Versus
VIKRAM SINGH SAHOTA
..... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI
Present:Mr. Rajiv Joshi, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. Krishan M. Vohra, Advocate for the respondent.
ARCHANA PURI, J. (ORAL)
Mr. Rajiv Joshi, Advocate, has made appearance on behalf of the applicant and filed Power of Attorney, which is taken on record. At this stage, he submits that he does not want to pursue with the transfer application and the same be dismissed as withdrawn.
Ordered accordingly.
| (ARCHANA PURI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 23.01.2026 Himanshu Vats |
JUDGE | ||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : | Yes/No | |
| Whether reportable | : | Yes/No |
PREETI 2026.01.23 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Kajal Singh
Vikram Singh Sahota
Archana Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court