Usha Rani Vs Rajpal

The applicant-wife has filed the present application for seeking transfer of the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act i.e. HMA/309/2024, titled ‘Rajpal Vs. Usha Rani’, filed by the respondenthusband, pending in the Family Court (Camp Court) Derabassi, District SAS Nagar and she seeks transfer of the same to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Kurukshetra.

¶17

In pursuance of notice issued, the respondent made appearance through counsel and filed reply.

¶18

Counsel for the parties heard.

¶19

At the very outset, it is submitted by the counsel for the

¶20

SONU applicant that the marriage between the parties to the lis, had taken place on 2026.02.27 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

¶21

2

¶22

TA-569-2025

¶23

08.03.2007. Two children i.e. one son and one daughter, were born from the said wedlock. The daughter is in the care and custody of the applicant, whereas the son is in the custody of the respondent. The applicant is not having any source of earning and as such, is dependent upon her parental family. Even, she has filed the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. i.e. MNT/124/2024, which is pending in the Courts at Kurukshetra and the respondent is making appearance in the same.

¶24

Besides the aforesaid, it is submitted that the applicant is a handicapped lady, who suffers from 75% of ‘permanent muscular dystrophy’ and the Unique Disability ID, in this regard has been issued to her reflecting her disability, copy whereof is Annexure P-3. In the given circumstances, it is submitted that it is difficult for the applicant, to commute a distance of about 75 kms., to defend the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, more particularly, while she is taking care of the growing female child.

¶25

On the other hand, counsel for the respondent, while making reference to the reply, submits that even the respondent is a handicapped person and he is suffering from 50% disability. In this regard, counsel has made reference to copy of the Unique Disability ID, placed on record. Also, it is submitted that it shall be difficult for the respondent also, to pursue the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, if so transferred.

¶26

In view of the submissions made aforesaid, it is pertinent to mention that unfortunately, both the applicant, as well as the respondent are handicapped persons. Even, two children born from the estranged marriage have been separated. The son is in the custody of the respondent, whereas, SONU the daughter is in the custody of the applicant. While considering the 2026.02.27 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

¶27

3

¶28

TA-569-2025

¶29

transfer application relating to the matrimonial dispute, the Courts generally consider various factors, such like, the child born from the wedlock of the parties (if any); which spouse is having the custody of the said child; capacity of such spouse to look after the child; the vocation of the spouses, so on and forth. Thereafter, balancing of the convenience/inconvenience of the parties, is to be done. Taking it to be so, even though, both the applicant, as well as the respondent are handicapped persons, but however, the extent of disability, in case of the applicant is more. Besides the same, other relevant factor, to be considered is about growing female child, to be in the care and custody of the applicant, who herself has no source of earning. Even, one other litigation, arising from this broken marriage is pending in the Courts at Kurukshetra and the same is being pursued by the respondent.

¶30

Taking into consideration all the aforesaid circumstances, it is just and expedient to accept the application. Hence, the transfer application is allowed and the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act i.e. HMA/309/2024, titled ‘Rajpal Vs. Usha Rani’, filed by the respondenthusband, stands transferred from the Family Court (Camp Court) Derabassi, District SAS Nagar, to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Kurukshetra. The requisite record of the aforesaid case be sent by the Family Court (Camp Court) Derabassi, to the District and Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra.

¶31

Learned District and Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra, shall assign the said petition to the Family Court, Kurukshetra. Even, the parties are directed to appear before the Family Court, Kurukshetra, within a period of one month from today onwards.

¶32

SONU 2026.02.27 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

¶33

TA-569-2025

¶34

4

¶35

However, considering the fact of respondent also, to be a handicapped person, he always has an option to file an application for making appearance before the Court concerned, as and when required, through virtual mode and upon filing of such application, the Court concerned shall consider the same and pass an appropriate order, in the fitness of circumstances.

¶36

(ARCHANA PURI) 27.02.2026 JUDGE Himanshu Vats Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶37

SONU 2026.02.27 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

Usha Rani v. Rajpal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Usha Rani v. Rajpal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajni Duggal Vs Deepak Kumar

Mohan Jeet Kaur Vs Kawaljit Singh and Another

Sukhwinder Kaur Vs Davinder Singh

Narinder Kaur Dhillon Vs Ranjodh Singh Dhillon

Kavita Vs Ravi Chhabra

Haragamdeep Singh Vs Maninder Singh and Others