Gurpreet Kaur Vs Taranjit Singh

The petitioner-wife, by way of present application/petition, seeks transfer of petition bearing HMA/176/2026 , titled “ Taranjit Singh Versus Gurpreet Kaur” filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 at the instance of respondent-husband; from the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Ambala to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Patiala.

¶18

[2] Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for transfer of the above said petition on the following grounds:-

¶19

(i) that the applicant-wife alongwith minor daughter is residing at her parental home at Patiala;

¶20

(ii) that she has no source of income;

¶21

(iii) that there is a distance of about 120 kms. (both sides) between Ambala and Patiala;

¶22

DINESH KUMAR 2026.07.14 14:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶23

[2]

¶24

T.A. No. 510 of 2026 (O&M)

¶25

(iv) that there is threat to the petitioner from the side of respondent and his family members;

¶26

(v) that three more cases filed by the petitioner are pending in the Courts at Patiala.

¶27

[3] On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent vehemently opposes the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner, while filing reply dated 13.07.2026 in the matter, which is taken on record.

¶28

Registry to tag/paginate the aforesaid reply dated 13.07.2026 at appropriate place in the paper-book.

¶29

[4] Having heard learned counsel for the parties besides going through the record, I find substance in the submission(s) made on behalf of the petitioner.

¶30

[5] Besides the facts/submission(s) noticed on behalf of the petitioner, the legal position in such like cases as the present one is also very clear. Reference in this regard may made to a decision rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in its decision rendered in Manjula Singh Chouhan Versus Vishal Singh Chouhan, reported as 2019 (13) SCC 660 , wherein it has been held that, in the interest of both the parties, all connected matrimonial proceedings should ordinarily be heard by the same Court and, accordingly, allowed the transfer application therein. Relevant paras-3 to 5 of the aforesaid decision are extracted hereunder:-

¶31

“ 3. As per the submission of the appellant, two cases are already pending in Family Court, Bhopal, and it will be in the interests of both the parties to try all their cases in Bhopal. Learned counsel for the respondent however, submits that it will suit to the appellant only, therefore, transfer may not be permitted. The fact remains that the respondent has to travel to Bhopal for conduct of other cases pending in Family Court, Bhopal.

¶32

4. We are of the view that it will be in the interests of both the parties that all their cases be heard together by the same Court.

¶33

DINESH KUMAR 2026.07.14 14:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶34

[3]

¶35

T.A. No. 510 of 2026 (O&M)

¶36

5. Therefore, H.M.A. Case No.71/2016 is transferred from Family Court, Indore to the Family Court, Bhopal.”

¶37

[6] Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in the humble opinion of this Court, it would be in the interest of both the parties that all their cases be heard together at the same place. Consequently, the transfer application is allowed and the petition bearing HMA/176/2026 (supra) filed at the instance of respondent-husband, stands transferred from the Family Court, Ambala to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Family Court, Patiala. The requisite record of the aforesaid case be sent by the Family Court, Ambala to the Court concerned at the earliest where the parties would appear within a period of one month from today.

¶38

[7] Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off.

¶39

July 13, 2026	( HARKESH MANUJA )
'dk kamra'	JUDGE
Whether Speaking/reasoned	Yes/No
Whether Reportable	Yes/No

¶40

DINESH KUMAR 2026.07.14 14:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Gurpreet Kaur v. Taranjit Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gurpreet Kaur v. Taranjit Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Pooja Mehta Alias Mahi Alias Pooja Insan Vs Davinder Wadhawan

Neetika Devi Vs Harish Chander

Chand Pal Vs Dr. Chander Shakher Khare and Another

Amanpreet Kaur Vs Ashvinder Kaur and Others

Jyoti Vs Mohit Mann

State of Punjab and etc. Vs Mansa Ram