Chhinderpal Kaur Vs Amritpal

The applicant-wife has filed the present application for seeking transfer of the petition under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act i.e. DMC/1588/2024, titled ‘Amritpal Vs. Chhinderpal Kaur’, filed by the respondent-husband, pending in the Family Court (Camp Court) Talwandi Sabo, District Bathinda and she seeks transfer of the same to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Sri Muktsar Sahib.

¶17

Upon notice issued, the respondent made appearance through counsel and filed reply.

¶18

HIMANSHU VATS 2026.01.15 09:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

¶19

2

¶20

TA-476-2025

¶21

Counsel for the parties heard.

¶22

At the very outset, it is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the marriage between the parties to the lis, had taken place on 22.01.2022. One son born from the said wedlock, who is about 2 years old, is in the care and custody of the applicant. Unfortunately, the matrimonial dispute arose between the parties. The applicant, along with her son, is residing at her parental place. She is not having any source of earning and as such, is dependent upon her parents. Even, she has filed the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C., as well as the petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, which are pending in the Courts at Sri Muktsar Sahib and respondent is making appearance in both the said cases. The distance between the two places is stated to be about 95 kms.

¶23

On the other hand, counsel for the respondent, while making reference to the reply, submits that the applicant has not come to the Court with clean hands. In fact, it is submitted that she was married, at the time of performance of marriage with the respondent and this fact was not disclosed. Also, it is submitted that the applicant has not sought divorce from her previous husband. Looking at her conduct, it is submitted that she is not entitled to seek transfer of the petition under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act.

¶24

In view of the aforesaid submissions, it is pertinent to mention that generally, the Courts lean towards convenience of the wife, while adjudicating on the transfer application relating to the matrimonial dispute, HIMANSHU VATS though, it may not be a thumb rule. Various other circumstances, spelt out 2026.01.15 09:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

¶25

3

¶26

TA-476-2025

¶27

from the material brought on record, ought to be taken into consideration. In the case in hand, there is one son born from the estranged marriage, who is about 2 years old and is presently in the care and custody of the applicant. Two other litigations arising from this matrimonial dispute, are already pending in the Courts at Sri Muktsar Sahib and the respondent is pursuing the same. Even, the distance between the two places is 95 kms. Also, the applicant is not having any source of earning. Even though, much emphasis has been laid upon the applicant having not disclosed about her previous marriage and also not having sought divorce from her previous husband, but however, this conduct can only be appraised by the concerned Court, where the petition under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, is pending adjudication. Suffice to consider, for the purposes of disposal of the present application about the constrained circumstances, going in favour of the applicant, as stated aforesaid, more particularly, considering 2 years old son to be in the care and custody of the applicant. Obviously the applicant must be facing challenges, while taking care of the minor child. Moreover, two other litigations, arising from this matrimonial dispute, are already pending in the Courts at Sri Muktsar Sahib.

¶28

In view of the aforesaid fact situation, it is just and expedient to accept the application. Hence, the transfer application is allowed and the petition under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act i.e. DMC/1588/2024, titled ‘Amritpal Vs. Chhinderpal Kaur’, filed by the respondent-husband, stands transferred from the Family Court (Camp Court) Talwandi Sabo, District Bathinda, to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Sri Muktsar HIMANSHU VATS Sahib. The requisite record of the aforesaid case be sent by the Family 2026.01.15 09:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

¶29

4

¶30

TA-476-2025

¶31

Court (Camp Court) Talwandi Sabo, to the District and Sessions Judge, Sri Muktsar Sahib.

¶32

Learned District and Sessions Judge, Sri Muktsar Sahib, shall assign the said petition to the Family Court, Sri Muktsar Sahib. Even, the parties are directed to appear before the Family Court, Sri Muktsar Sahib, within a period of one month from today onwards.

¶33

(ARCHANA PURI) 14.01.2026 JUDGE Himanshu Vats Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶34

HIMANSHU VATS 2026.01.15 09:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

Chhinderpal Kaur v. Amritpal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chhinderpal Kaur v. Amritpal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Divya Vs Nikhil

Manpreet Karu Vs Varinder Singh

Harsimran Kaur Vs Charanjit Singh

Rubina Rabina Vs Karan Gautam

Meenu Bhatia Vs Ankit Chaba

Aarti Arora Vs Sanjiv Kumar