Allowed

Karanveer Kaur v. Harinder Singh

Punjab & Haryana HC16 Jul 2026TA/1244/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application for transfer of a divorce petition filed by the husband was allowed. The High Court held that since a Section 9 petition is pending at Faridkot, transferring the divorce case there ensures all matrimonial proceedings are heard by the same court.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of HMA petition Harinder Singh vs Karanvir Kaur from Family Court, Dera Bassi to Family Court, Faridkot.

Karanveer Kaur Vs Harinder Singh — Matrimonial and Divorce | Punjab & Haryana HC (2026)

¶1

TA-1244-2025 (O&M)

¶2

--1--

¶3

107 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

TA-1244-2025 (O&M) Decided on:-16.07.2026

Karanveer Kaur

….Applicant.

vs.

Harinder Singh ….Respondent.

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA

¶10

Present: Mr. Dr. Buta Singh Bairagi, Advocate for the applicant.

¶11

Mr. D.S. Virk, Advocate for the respondent.

¶12

¶13

HARKESH MANUJA J. (Oral)

¶14

The applicant-wife, by way of present application, seeks transfer of petition bearing HMA-138-2024, titled as “Harinder Singh vs. Karanveer Kaur” filed under Section 13(ia)-(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter to be referred as “1955 Act”) for dissolution of marriage at the instance of respondent-husband; from the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Dera Bassi, District SAS Nagar (Mohali) to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Faridkot.

¶15

Briefly stating, the marriage between the applicant and respondent was solemnized on 21.11.2016; on account of matrimonial discord between the parties, the above mentioned petition under Section 13(ia)-(ib) of the 1955 Act, came to be preferred at the instance of respondent-husband. Thereupon, the present application seeking transfer thereof came to be filed by the applicant-wife.

¶16

Learned counsel for the applicant, inter alia , contends that the

¶17

SONIKA 2026.07.20 14:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

¶18

TA-1244-2025 (O&M)

¶19

--2--

¶20

applicant-wife is currently residing at her parental home, Faridkot. Accordingly, a prayer is made for transfer of the above mentioned petition filed at the instance of respondent-husband from Family Court, Dera Bassi, District SAS Nagar Mohali to Family Court, Faridkot.

¶21

On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent vehemently opposes the prayer made in the present application. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the paper-book.

¶22

In the present case, admittedly, the applicant-wife has filed petition under Section 9 of the 1955 Act, which is pending adjudication before the competent Court of jurisdiction at Faridkot.

¶23

As per the averments made in the present transfer application, the applicant-wife has no independent source of income and is solely dependent upon the mercy of her parents, who are residing at Faridkot. The distance between Faridkot and Dera Bassi is approximately 240 kms.

¶24

Furthermore, the Hon’ble Supreme Court in its decision rendered in “ Manjula Singh Chouhan Versus Vishal Singh Chouhan”, reported as 2019 (13) SCC 660 held that, in the interest of both the parties, all connected matrimonial proceedings should ordinarily be heard by the same Court and, accordingly, allowed the transfer application therein. Relevant paragraphs No. 3 to 5 thereof are reproduced hereunder:-

¶25

“3. As per the submission of the appellant, two cases are already pending in Family Court, Bhopal, and it will be in the interests of both the parties to try all their cases in Bhopal. Learned counsel for the respondent however, submits that it will suit to the appellant only, therefore, transfer may not be permitted. The fact remains that the respondent has to travel to Bhopal for conduct of other cases pending in Family Court, Bhopal.

¶26

4. We are of the view that it will be in the interests of both the parties that all their cases be heard together by the same Court. 5. Therefore, H.M.A. Case No.71/2016 is transferred from Family Court, Indore to the Family Court, Bhopal.”

¶27

SONIKA 2026.07.20 14:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

¶28

TA-1244-2025 (O&M)

¶29

--3--

¶30

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in the humble opinion of this Court, since a petition under Section 9 of the 1955 Act is pending before the ld. Family Court, Faridkot, therefore, it would be in the interest of both the parties that all their cases be heard together at the same place. Consequently the transfer application is allowed and the petition under Section 13(ia)-(ib) of the 1955 Act, titled “Harinder Singh vs. Karanvir Kaur” , filed by the respondent-husband, stands transferred from the Family Court, Dera Bassi, SAS Nagar Mohali, to the Family Court of competent jurisdiction at Faridkot. The requisite record of the aforesaid case be sent by the Family Court, Dera Bassi, SAS Nagar Mohali to the Court concerned.

¶31

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off.

¶32

16.07.2026 sonika

¶33

(HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE

¶34

(i) Whether speaking/reasoned:

¶35

Yes/No (ii) Whether reportable: Yes/ No

¶36

SONIKA 2026.07.20 14:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

Karanveer Kaur v. Harinder Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karanveer Kaur v. Harinder Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Simranjeet Kaur Vs Harjot Singh

Nisha Saini Vs Mohit Kumar

Prem Kumar Vs Union of India and Others

Deepika Vs Deepak Kankar

Renu Bala Vs Sandeep Kumar

Prity Vs Ankit Sharma and Another