Applicant sought withdrawal of a transfer application, citing material omissions. The court dismissed the application as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh with better particulars.
Application dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to file afresh with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.201-1 TA-1052-2024 Date of Decision: 19.01.2026
NITIKA
....Applicant
Versus
DEEPAK ARORA
....Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI
Present: Mr. J.S. Grewal, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. Suresh Singla, Advocate for the respondent.
ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
At this stage, the counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to pursue with the transfer application, on account of several material omissions and the same be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file afresh, with better particulars.
Ordered accordingly.
(ARCHANA PURI) JUDGE
19.01.2026 Preeti S. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
PREETI 2026.01.19 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Nitika
Deepak Arora
Archana Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
