The High Court dismissed this appeal due to the complete absence of either party on the hearing date. The court observed that despite multiple records of non-attendance despite service of summons via e-mail and clerk, the appellants are not interested in pursuing the present appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
223
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-663-2008 (O&M) Date of Decision: SEPTEMBER 10, 2026
DISTRICT RED CROSS SOCIETY AND ORS ........Appellant Versus SATISH KUMAR ........Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present: None for the appellants.
None for the respondent.
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
De s pite the case having been called, no one has put i n appearance on behalf of the parties. A peru s al of the paper-book reflect s that even on 1 8 .07.2025, 26.11.2025, 23.01 . 2026 and 02.07.2026 no on e appeared on b ehalf of the appellants despite learned counsel for th e appellant bein g served through e-mail an d appellants served throug h Clerk.
It a p pears that appellants are not interested in pursuing th e present appea l . As such, the present app e al is dismissed for want o f prosecution.
Pe n ding application(s), if any, sh a ll also stand disposed of. Co p y of this order be conveyed t o the parties.
| 10.09.2026 Tejwinder |
(HA RK J |
ESH MANUJA) UDGE |
|---|---|---|
| Whether speaking/reasone d |
Yes/No | |
| Whether reportable | Yes/No |
TEJWINDER SINGH 2026.09.11 18:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
District Red Cross Society and Ors
Satish Kumar
Harkesh Manuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
