Dismissal in default; want of prosecution; non-appearance of counsel despite e-mail intimation; appellant no longer interested in pursuing appeal; Sadhu Ram vs Harjit Singh; RSA-4738-2002 (O&M); High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh; Deepak Gupta J.; decision date 20-03-2026; no findings on merits.
211 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-4738-2002 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 20, 2026
Sadhu Ram
… Appellant
Versus
Harjit Singh …Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: - None.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J.(Oral)
There is no representa�on on behalf of any of the par�es. It is despite the fact that counsel for both the sides have been duly informed through their respec�ve e-mails, as reported by the Registry. Similar was the posi�on on the last date of hearing also. It appears that the appellant is no longer interested in pursuing this appeal.
Dismissed in default for want of prosecu�on.
March 20, 2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
SARITA RANI 2026.03.20 12:55 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
