This is a single-paragraph order in an appeal admitted in 2004. The High Court dismissed the appeal due to default as notices were returned showing incomplete addresses, indicating the appellant lost interest. The matter may be revived if a cause survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RSA-3237-2002 (O&M)
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
204
RSA-3237-2002 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.09.2026
BALDEV SINGH ....Appellant
Versus
SUKHWINDER SINGH
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR
Present : None.
YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR. J.(Oral)
(YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR) 11.09.2026 JUDGE amandeep Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No
AMANDEEP GOSAIN 2026.09.11 15:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
Baldev Singh
Sukhwinder Singh
Yashvir Singh Rathor
Amandeep Gosain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
