Dismissed¶20

Mohd.Bashir v. Chandra Mohani Jaine T.C

Punjab & Haryana HC18 Mar 2026RSA/2454/2001

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal in default for want of prosecution of cross second appeals RSA-2454-2001 (O&M) and RSA-1143-2006 (O&M), decided orally by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, on 18.03.2026. Parties: Mohd. Bashir @ Mohamad Bashir Ahmed; Chandra Mohani Jain and Ors; Kesri Dass Jain thr LRs and Ors. Counsel Lalit Sharma, Advocate and Pardeep Goyal, Advocate absent on both hearings despite telephonic and text-message intimation reported by the Registry and a final warning fixing 19.01.2026 as the last opportunity. No substantive issue adjudicated; no statute or precedent cited.

What did the court decide?

From the circumstances it clearly appears that none of the parties are interested in pursuing these appeals. ¶18

Mohd.Bashir Vs Chandra Mohani Jaine T.C — Punjab & Haryana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

¶3

220

¶4

I. RSA-2454-2001 (O&M) Mohd. Bashir @ Mohamad Bashir Ahmed …..Appellant Vs. Chandra Mohani Jain and Ors .….Respondents II. RSA-1143-2006 (O&M) Kesri Dass Jain thr LRs and Ors …..Appellants Vs. Mohd. Bashir @ Mohd. Bashir Ahmed and Anr .….Respondents Date of Decision:18.03.2026

¶5

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA

¶6

Present:None.

¶7

¶8

DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)

¶9

On the previous date of hearing, following order was passed:

¶10

“These are cross appeals and Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate as well as Mr. Pardeep Goyal, Advocate, who are represen%ng the par%es in both the appeals have been duly informed about the date fixed telephonically and through text message, as reported by the Registry. However, there is no representa%on on behalf of any of the par%es. Although, it appears that par%es are no longer interested in pursuing these appeals, s%ll in the interest of jus%ce, adjourned to 19.01.2026, making it clear that no further opportunity shall be provided.

¶11

Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected case file.”

¶12

Despite the strict order, making it clear that no further

¶13

opportunity shall be provided, none of the counsels of any of the par%es

¶14

has appear in these two appeals.

¶15

NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.03.18 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶16

RSA-2454-2001 (O&M) RSA-1143-2006 (O&M)