This is a one-line order dismissing an appeal for non-prosecution due to the appellants' absence and failure to appear despite notices.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
205 RSA-2263-2000 (O&M) Date of decision:10.09.2026
SAVITA RANI AND ANR. ...APPELLANTS
VERSUS
SANJEEV KUMAR ...RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL
Present: None for appellants.
Mr. Atul Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent.
PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL)
Notice issued to appellants received back with report that they
are not residing at given address.
appellants.
(PARMOD GOYAL) JUDGE
10.09.2026
Sunil Chander
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
SUNIL CHANDER 2026.09.11 09:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Savita Rani and Another
Sanjeev Kumar
Parmod Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
