Dismissed¶16
Bachittar Singh v. Veer Pal Kaur
Punjab & Haryana HCRSA/2215/1996
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Dismissal in default for want of prosecution; non-prosecution of appeal; absence of counsel; appellant duly served but no representation; Bachittar Singh v. Veer Pal Kaur; RSA-2215-1996 (O&M); High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh; Deepak Gupta, J.; decision date 26.11.2025; prior order dated 02.12.2023; non-reportable.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed in default for want of prosecution, as the sole appellant had been duly served with notice (issued in compliance of the order dated 02.12.2023) but did not appear and appeared no longer interested in pursuing the appeal. ¶16