Surjit Singh Vohra v. the Confed and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissal as withdrawn of Regular Second Appeal RSA-1541-2002 (Surjit Singh Vohra v. The Confed through its District Manager and another), decided May 01, 2026 by Justice Deepak Gupta (Oral). Execution had been disposed of as satisfied by the Executing Court on 25.01.2003 after counsel for the decree holder Confed received a cheque of Rs. 99,000/- and both sides made statements; the appellant (J.D.) stated he would be entitled to receive back the money paid if the RSA succeeded. Counsel: Abhishek Shukla for Ms. Garima Jindal for the appellant; Amit Jaiswal for respondent No.1. No statutory provision or precedent engaged; respondent No.2 identified only as 'another'; court/forum name not stated in the document.
What did the court decide?
In view of the statement of learned counsel for the appellant that the amount had already been deposited before the Executing Court and the execution stood satisfied, the appellant withdrew the appeal and the present appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.