State appeal in a land acquisition compensation matter disposed of by adopting the order passed the same day in a companion appeal against Prahladi Devi; no independent reasons recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RFA-2556-2004 (O&M) [1]
117 (8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
*********
RFA-2556-2004 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.02.2026
State of Haryana
…….Appellant
Versus
Shri Shiv Ram and another ..….Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present: Mr.Abhinash Jain, DAG, H aryana.
Ms.Mansi Majoka, Advoc a te for Mr.BS. Tewatia, Advocat e for the landowner(s).
-.-
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
For orders, see RFA-2553-2004 , titled as ‘ State of
Haryana Vs. Smt.Prahladi Devi and others’ , decided vide orde r of
even date.
02.02.2026 (HARKESH MANUJA) sanjay JUDGE
Whether speaking/reason e d? Yes/No Whether Reportable? Yes/No
SANJAY GUPTA 2026.02.12 19:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Haryana Vs. Smt. Prahladi Devi and othersReferred
RFA-2553-2004
State of Haryana
Shri Shiv Ram and another
Harkesh Manuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
