GMADA appeal in a land acquisition compensation matter with cross-objection by landowners. The court passed no independent order, directing that the matter be governed by its order of even date in RFA No.3096 of 2017 (Arminderjit Kaur).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.2268 of 2019 (O&M) with Cross-Objection No.142 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.02.2026
GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GMADA), THROUGH ITS CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR ......Appellant
......Appellant
Vs
SATNAM SINGH AND OTHERS
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present: Mr. Vinod Ghai, Sr. Advocate with Mr. V.G. Jauhar, Advocate for the appellant(s)/GMADA.
Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab.
Mr. Naresh Kaushal, Advocate and Mr. Nitish Kaushal, Advocate for the cross-objector(s)/landowner(s)/respondent(s).
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral)
For detailed order, see order of even date passed in RFA No.3096 of
2017 (O&M) with Cross-Objection No.116-CI of 2017 (O&M) titled ‘Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA) through its Estate Officer Vs. Arminderjit Kaur and Anr.”
(HARKESH MANUJA)
February 18, 2026 JUDGE Vishal Sethi
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
MOHMED ATIK 2026.02.25 15:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA), through its Chief Administrator
Satnam Singh and Others
Harkesh Manuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
