(O&M) Parkash Chand & Another v. State of Haryana & Another

What is this about?

RFA No.2165 of 1996 (O&M). The supplied judgment text is severely corrupted by encoding/OCR noise: party names, bench composition, procedural details, issues, holdings, statutes, precedents and the final disposition are not recoverable as verbatim text. The only reliably legible elements are the case-number banner 'RFA No.2165 of 1996 (O&M)' (recurring at the head of each page) and a recurring digital-attestation line reading 'MOHMED ATIK 2026.01.30 19:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment'. No substantive legal content could be extracted without violating the no-invention rule.