Appeal disposed of by reference to a companion appeal of even date between the same State department, with no independent reasoning recorded in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RFA-1147-1997 (O&M) [1]
113 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA-1147-1997 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.02.2026 Ramesh Chand …….Appellant
Versus
Haryana State through Secretary, PWD(B&R), Deptt. Chandigarh.
..….Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present: Mr. H.S. Kasan, Advocate for the appellant(s).
Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, H aryana.
-.-
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
For orders, see RFA-1146-1997 , titled as Kamla Devi Vs. Haryana State through Secretary, PWD(B&R), Deptt. Chandigarh ,
decided v ide order of even date.
09.02.2026 (HARKESH MANUJA) sanjay JUDGE
Whether speaking/reason e d? Yes/No Whether Reportable? Yes/No
SANJAY GUPTA 2026.02.17 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kamla Devi Vs. Haryana State through Secretary, PWD(B&R), Deptt. ChandigarhReferred
RFA-1146-1997
Ramesh Chand
Haryana State through Secretary, PWD(B&R), Deptt. Chandigarh
Harkesh Manuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
