Review application dismissed in default for want of prosecution after the review petitioners failed to appear on two consecutive hearings, indicating they were no longer interested in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
108
RA-CR-142-2025 in CR-49-2004 Date of Decision:17.02.2026
Paramjit (since deceased) thr his LRs and anr …..Pe22oners Vs.
Gurbax Rai Sood (since deceased) thr his LRs .….Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present:None.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
There is no representa�on on behalf of the review pe��oners.
Same was the posi�on on the previous date of hearing.
It appears that review pe��oners are no longer interested in
pursuing the review applica�on.
Dismissed in default for want of prosecu�on.
(DEEPAK GUPTA)
JUDGE February 17, 2026 Nee�ka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.02.17 17:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Paramjit (since deceased) thr his LRs and anr
Gurbax Rai Sood (since deceased) thr his LRs
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
