Commissioner Municipal Corporation Nit Faridabad Vs Mamman Ram and Another — Punjab & Haryana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Commissioner Municipal Corporation Nit Faridabad Vs Mamman Ram and Another — Punjab & Haryana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

The appeals/petitions (including LPA-2007-2025, Deep Chand v. State of Haryana and others, and the connected cases) were disposed of in the same terms as the Coordinate Bench decision in LPA No. 1810-2025 (Aas Mohammad and others v. State of Haryana and others, dated 23.04.2026); all pending miscellaneous applications, including condonation of delay, stand disposed of, and a photocopy of the order is to be placed on the file of connected cases.

Issue for consideration

Whether the pending appeals/petitions, which raise a question of law similar to the one already considered and answered by this Court in LPA No. 1810-2025 (Aas Mohammad and others v. State of Haryana and others, dated 23.04.2026), should be disposed of in the same terms.

Ratio / Principle

Since a similar question of law has already been considered and answered by this Court in LPA No. 1810-2025 (Aas Mohammad and others v. State of Haryana and others, dated 23.04.2026), the present appeals/petitions are disposed of in the same terms; ordered accordingly.

Key takeaways

All pending miscellaneous applications, including condonation of delay, stand disposed of.ratio¶23

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Oral order dated 17.07.2026 by Harsimran Singh Sethi and Amarinder Singh Grewal, JJ., disposing of a batch of Letters Patent Appeals/petitions against the State of Haryana (lead case LPA-2007-2025, Deep Chand v. State of Haryana and others; connected cases include Naval Singh, Daya Ram, Jagat Singh, Satyabir, Babu Lal, and Commissioner Municipal Corporation Faridabad v. Lal Singh). With the agreement of learned counsel for the parties, and since a similar question of law had already been considered and answered by this Court in LPA No. 1810-2025 (Aas Mohammad and others v. State of Haryana and others, dated 23.04.2026), the appeals/petitions were disposed of in the same terms; all pending miscellaneous applications, including condonation of delay, stand disposed of, and a photocopy of the order was directed to be placed on the files of the connected cases.

POONAM 2026.07.20 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

6. LPA-85 NAVAL SINGH AND OTHERS Vs	8-2025 (O&M) ...Appellants
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS	...Respondents
7. LPA-85	9-2025 (O&M)
DAYA RAM AND OTHERS	...Appellants
Vs
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS	...Respondents
8. LPA-90	5-2025 (O&M)
JAGAT SINGH AND ANOTHER	...Appellants
Vs
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS	...Respondents
9. LPA-81	2-2025 (O&M)
SATYABIR	...Appellant
Vs
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS	...Respondents
10. LPA-10	60-2025
BABU LAL	...Appellant
Vs
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS	...Respondents
11. LPA-18	56-2024 (O&M)
COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL CORPOR OTHERS	ATION FARIDABAD AND ...Appellant
Vs
LAL SINGH AND OTHERS	...Respondents

POONAM 2026.07.20 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

LPA-2007-2025 (O&M)

12.

DEEP CHAND

...Appellant

Vs

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL

Present: Mr. Jagbir Malik, Advocate for the appellant in LPA-1287-2024.

Mr. Baldev Raj Mahajan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate Ms. Nitika Goel, Advocate Mr. Mohit Kumar Sharma, Advocate for appellant in LPA-514-2020, 1856-2024, 793-2024 and LPA-2469-2024.

Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Ashish Jhamb, Advocate for appellant in LPA-2007-2025. Mr. Tilak Raj, Advocate for respondent no.3 in LPA-1060-2025. Mr. B.R. Rana, Advocate for respondent No.1 in LPA-514-2020.

Ms. Dheerja, Advocate for respondent No.3 in LPA-858-2025 and LPA-859-2025. for respondent No.2 in LPA-905-2025.

Mr. Ravinder Singh Randhawa, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Karanyog Singh Riar, Advocate for respondent in LPA-79-2020 and 514-2020.

Mr. Nitin Kaushal, Addl. A.G. Haryana.

HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (ORAL)

Learned counsel for the parties agrees that keeping in view the decision of the Coordinate Bench in LPA No. 1810-2025 titled as Aas Mohammad and others Vs. State of Haryana and others dated 23.04.2026 where similar question of law has already been considered and answered by this

POONAM2026.07.20 17:03 Court, the present appeals/petitions be disposed of in the same terms. I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Ordered accordingly.

All pending miscellaneous applications including condonation of delay, if

any, stand disposed of.

Photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected cases.

(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE

17.07.2026 (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) poonam JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

POONAM 2026.07.20 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

POONAM 2026.07.20 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document