The appeal was disposed of by oral order without reasoning on merits. It relied on a co-judgment decided on the same date, LPA-29-2026. Pending applications were also disposed off. No substantive legal proposition or outcome is articulated in this text beyond the procedural disposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
203-39
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
LPA-3742-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 10.07.2026
UNION OF INDIA
…. Appellant
VERSUS
ADESH WELFARE SOCIETY AND ORS …. Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI
Present : Ms. Divya Sharma, Senior Advocate with (through hybrid mode)
Mr. Karan Bhardwaj, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Gagneshwar Walia, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Mr. Jastej Singh, Addl. AG Punjab and
Ms. Mandeep Kaur, DAG Punjab for respondent Nos.2 to 6.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
(ALKA SARIN) JUDGE
10.07.2026
(AMARJOT BHATTI) JUDGE
Aman Jain
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No
AMAN JAIN 2026.07.14 09:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Union of India
Adesh Welfare Society
Alka Sarin
Amarjot Bhatti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
