Appeal against refusal to interfere in an ongoing disciplinary inquiry. State counsel stated the inquiry would conclude within three months if the appellant cooperated; the court disposed of the appeal with that observation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
148 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
LPA-1443-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:29.05.2026
RUCHIRA KHULLAR ....APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ….RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR
Present: Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate Ms. Kaanan Jain, Advocate and Ms. Indu Bala, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana.
ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J. (Oral)
CM-3813-LPA-2026 (placing on record)
Main Case (O&M)
Single Judge refusing to interfere in the ongoing inquiry against the appellant.
Court as to by the time within which such ongoing inquiry could be
SURESH KUMAR 2026.05.30 14:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
LPA-1443-2026 (O&M)
2
concluded.
disposed of.
[ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA] JUDGE
[ROHIT KAPOOR] JUDGE
MAY 29, 2026
Rahul Joshi
SURESH KUMAR 2026.05.30 14:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the ongoing disciplinary inquiry against the appellant should be completed within a specified time frame.
Ruchira Khullar
State of Haryana and Others
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Rohit Kapoor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
