Pr Commissioner of Income Tax -1 Ludhiana v. M/S Vardhaman Acrylic Limited Chandigarh Road Ludhiana
Case brief
What is this about?
Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh; ITA-109-2016; Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s Vardhaman Acrylic Limited; decision date 24.02.2026; appeal disposed of by cross-reference to detailed order of even date in ITA-107-2016 (same parties); pending applications disposed of; bench: Jagmohan Bansal J. (author, oral) with Amarinder Singh Grewal J.; appellant counsel: Ranvijay Singh (Sr. Standing Counsel), Nikita Garg (Jr. Standing Counsel), Vidhul Kapoor; respondent counsel: Radhika Suri (Sr. Advocate), Abhinav Narang, Parnika Singla; no statutes cited and no precedent analysed in this order.
What did the court decide?
This appeal is disposed of by reference to the detailed order of even date passed in ITA-107-2016 (Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s Vardhaman Acrylic Limited); the operative orders are those contained in that companion order.