Ajmer and Others v. State of Haryana and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh; INCOMP-1297-2026; Ajmer and Others v. State of Haryana and Ors.; Jagmohan Bansal, J. (oral); decision 01.07.2026; incomplete petition filed 25.02.2026 by Sanchit Punia, Advocate; Registry objections not removed; Rule 9, Chapter 1, Part-A, Volume V, PHHC Rules and Orders — 40-day re-filing period lapsed; cause-list note and SMS to counsel/clerk unanswered; no appearance on 01.07.2026; no further order required; file consigned to record; pending applications disposed of; DAG Haryana Abhinav Kalia for respondents; no cases cited; no impugned order; administrative closure, not reportable substance.
What did the court decide?
In view of the factual matrix (objections not removed, no response to notices, no appearance on the date of listing), no further order is required to be passed and the file is to be consigned to the record.