The single-judge bench allowed the application to make good the court fee deficiency and condoned the delay in filing the appeal before disposing of the connected causes.
Application to make good court fee deficiency allowed; delay of 5 days in filing appeal condoned; connected causes disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
F.A.O.No.6760 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 28th , 2016
Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation, Limited (PUNSUP), Sector 34-B, Chandigarh
...Appellant
Versus
M/s Ram Nath and Sons, Faridkot Road, Mandi Guruhhar Sahai, District Ferozepur & others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL, JUDGE
Present: Mr.Deepak Sabherwal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr.Pardeep Bajaj, Advocate for Mr.Parvez Chugh, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
AMIT RAWAL, J. (Oral)
CM No.29163-CII of 2010
Prayer in the application is for making good the deficiency in
the court fee of `200/-.
Allowed subject to all just exceptions.
CM No.29164-CII of 2010
Delay of 5 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
CM stands disposed of.
RAMESH KUMAR 2016.05.04 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
F.A.O.No.6760 of 2010 (O&M) : 2 :
FAO No.6760 of 2010
For orders, see F.A.O.No.4558 of 2009 (Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation, Limited (PUNSUP), Sector 34-B, Chandigarh Versus M/s Ram Nath and Sons, Faridkot Road, Mandi Guruhhar
Sahai, District Ferozepur & others), decided on 28.4.2016.
April 28, 2016 (AMIT RAWAL ) ramesh JUDGE
RAMESH KUMAR 2016.05.04 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation, Limited
M/s Ram Nath and Sons
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
