First appeal disposed of in absence of the appellants, with liberty to revive if they wish to pursue it or any cause survives.
Liberty granted to appellants to revive the appeal; Registry directed to send a copy of the order to them.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
224
FAO No.4497 of 2024 Date of decision: November 7th , 2025
Sube Singh and others
.....Appellants
Versus
Rajesh Kumar and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL
Present: None for the appellants.
Mr. Raman Chawla, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Mr. Nigam K. Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent No.3.
VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)
November 7th , 2025 (VIKAS BAHL) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No
PUNEET SACHDEVA 2025.11.07 14:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Sube Singh and others
Rajesh Kumar and others
Vikas Bahl
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
