Ramesh Kumar v. Subhash Chand
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissal of appeal for non-prosecution; death of appellant during pendency; prolonged absence of counsel; liberty to legal representatives to seek revival subject to limitation and sufficient cause; disposal of pending applications. Forum: High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh; single judge (Amarinder Singh Grewal, J.). Case: FAO-4251-2002, decided 13.05.2026. Parties: Ramesh Kumar (appellant, deceased) v. Subhash Chand and others incl. Oriental Insurance Company (respondent No.3) and United Insurance Company (respondent No.6). Advocates: Mayank Yadav (respondents No.1 and 2); Deepak Chaudhary/Ram Avtar (respondent No.3); Neeraj Raizada (respondent No.6). No statutes or cases cited; no substantive-law ruling; whether reportable: No.
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to the legal representatives of the appellant to seek revival of the appeal, subject to limitation, upon showing sufficient cause.