This appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as appellants and their counsel failed to appear consecutively on two hearing dates, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter without engaging with any legal issues.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO 4108 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 05, 2020
Rajbala and others
... Appellants.
vs.
Ganga Singh and another
....Respondents.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FATEH DEEP SINGH
Present : None for the appellants.
FATEH DEEP SINGH, J. (Oral)
In spite of repeated calls, none has come present on behalf of the appellants, which was the situation even on the last date of hearing as well and it being the second consecutive default, impels this Court to hold that neither the appellants nor their counsel is interested in pursuing the present appeal.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
February 05, 2020 (FATEH DEEP SINGH)
amit rana JUDGE
Whether reasoned/speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
AMIT RANA 2020.02.07 16:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Rajbala and others
Ganga Singh and another
Fateh Deep Singh
Amit Rana
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
