The High Court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution due to the appellants' consecutive absence, finding them uninterested in pursuing the matter.
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO 4095 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 05, 2020
Bansala Devi and others
... Appellant.
vs.
Ganga Singh and another
....Respondents.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FATEH DEEP SINGH
Present : None for the appellants.
FATEH DEEP SINGH, J. (Oral)
In spite of repeated calls, none has come present on behalf of the appellants, which was the situation even on the last date of hearing as well and it being the second consecutive default, impels this Court to hold that neither the appellants nor their counsel is interested in pursuing the present appeal.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
February 05, 2020 (FATEH DEEP SINGH)
amit rana JUDGE
Whether reasoned/speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
AMIT RANA 2020.02.07 16:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Bansala Devi
Ganga Singh
Fateh Deep Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
