First appeal from a motor accident claim, pending since 2002, dismissed in default because the appellants and counsel were repeatedly absent with no steps taken to prosecute. Liberty granted to seek restoration within three months on sufficient cause; miscellaneous applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FAO No. 3987 of 2002(O&M) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
(205.1) FAO No. 3987 of 2002(O&M) Date of Decision: 27.02.2026
Sandeep Kaur and others ...Appellants
Versus
M/s Anupurna Rice Mills and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Present: None for Appellants.
Mr. Sahil Mahendiratta, Advocate and Mr. Ashutosh Dhankar, Advocate for Respondent no.1
Mr. Neeraj Khanna, Advocate for Mr. Ravinder Arora, Advocate for Respondent-Insurance Company.
VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)
SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.03.06 15:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
FAO No. 3987 of 2002(O&M) 2
(VIRINDER AGGARWAL)
27.02.2026 JUDGE
Saurav Pathania
(i) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No (ii) Whether reportable : Yes/No
SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.03.06 15:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sandeep Kaur and others
M/s Anupurna Rice Mills
Insurance Company
Virinder Aggarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
