Dismissed¶14
Gurmukh Singh v. Gurnam Singh and Others
Punjab & Haryana HCFAO/3840/2001
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
FAO appeal dismissed in default for want of prosecution; appellant absent, counsel duly informed; mediation-centre report: case a non-starter; High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh; Deepak Gupta, J. (oral); decision date 16.01.2026; case FAO-3840-2001; appellant Gurmukh Singh; respondents Gurnam Singh and others (respondent No.4-Insurance Company); advocates Pritam S. Saini (for appellant), Aseem Aggarwal (for respondent No.4-Insurance Company).
What did the court decide?
As nobody appeared for the appellant despite his counsel having been duly informed, and the appellant appeared no longer interested in pursuing the appeal, the appeal is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. ¶14