Dismissed¶20

Maninder Kaur v. Jagdish Kumar

Punjab & Haryana HC7 May 2026FAO/3591/2001

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Punjab and Haryana High Court; FAO-3591-2001; Maninder Kaur and Others v. Jagdish Kumar and Others; dismissal in default; want of prosecution; non-appearance of appellants; e-mail intimation by Registry; liberty to seek restoration/revival; sufficient cause; pending applications disposed of; Amarinder Singh Grewal, J.; decision date 07.05.2026.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to the appellants to seek restoration/revival of the appeal in accordance with law, in case any sufficient cause survives for consideration. ¶20

Maninder Kaur Vs Jagdish Kumar — Punjab & Haryana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

FAO-3591-2001

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

(221/2)

¶4

FAO-3591-2001

¶5

Date of Decision:-07.05.2026

¶6

Maninder Kaur and Others

¶7

……Appellants

¶8

Versus

¶9

Jagdish Kumar and Others

¶10

……Respondents

¶11

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL

¶12

¶13

Present: None for the parties.

¶14

¶15

AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral)

¶16

There is no representation on behalf of the parties.

¶17

As per the report of the Registry, intimation regarding the pendency of the present case was duly conveyed to learned counsel for the appellants through e-mail. A perusal of the case file reveals that even on the previous date of hearing, neither the appellants nor anyone on their behalf had appeared before this Court. Even today, there is no representation on their behalf.

¶18

In the aforesaid circumstances, it is evident that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the present appeal pending on the docket of the Court for an indefinite period.

¶19

It, therefore, appears that the appellants are no longer interested in prosecuting the present appeal.

¶20

Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed in default for want of prosecution.

¶21

KANCHAN 2026.05.08 12:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment

¶22

-1-

¶23

FAO-3591-2001

¶24

However, liberty is granted to the appellants to seek restoration/revival of the appeal in accordance with law, in case any sufficient cause survives for consideration.

¶25

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of

¶26

accordingly.

¶27

(AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE

¶28

07.05.2026

¶29

Shubham

¶30

Whether speaking/reasoned:-	Yes/No
Whether Reportable:-	Yes/No

¶31

KANCHAN 2026.05.08 12:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment

¶32

-2-

Maninder Kaur v. Jagdish Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maninder Kaur v. Jagdish Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

(O&M) Avtar Singh & Anr. Vs Sarbjit Singh & Ors.

Harbans Kaur & Ors. Vs Sarbjit Singh & Ors.

Vikram Jindal Vs M/S A.S. Frozen Foods

B.D. Trivedi Vs Laxmi Devi and Anr.

Gurmeet Kaur Vs Jagdish Kumar & Ors.

Monu Vs Hanbans Singh Since Deceased through His Lrs