Dismissed¶7
Balbir Kaur v. Jhina Singh & Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCFAO/3559/2005
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Non-prosecution dismissal of two FAO appeals (FAO-3559-2005 (O&M) and FAO-3558-2005 (O&M)) by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh on 06.07.2026 (Parmod Goyal, J.). Appellant Balbir Kaur; respondents Jhina Singh and others / Jhina Singh. Grounds: counsel (Sudhir Pruthi, Advocate) absent despite notice, incomplete/illegible paperbook, respondent No.1 served but absent. Pending applications disposed of. No statutory provisions or precedents cited; no quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
Both appeals (FAO-3559-2005 (O&M) and FAO-3558-2005 (O&M)) are dismissed for non-prosecution, as despite notice counsel for the appellant did not appear and no complete and legible paperbook was available, and respondent No.1, though served, also did not appear. ¶7