The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant is reported to be dead, notice unserved, and legal representatives uninterested in pursuing it. Pending applications disposed of.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
219
FAO-2420-2002 Date Of Decision: 10.09.2026
JAI PARKASH ....APPELLANT
VERSUS
SATOSH KUMARI AND ORS ...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR
Present : None for the appellant.
Respondents No.1, 2 proforma respondent/claimants and respondent No.5 proforma respondent.
*********
YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR, J. (ORAL)
(YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR)
JUDGE
| 10.09.2026 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Vishal Vardhan | |||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : | Yes / No | |
| Whether reportable | : | Yes / No |
VISHAL VARDHAN 2026.09.11 15:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Jai Parkash
Satosh Kumari And ORS
Yashvir Singh Rathor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
