Appeal by an insurance company against Kusum and others; the court passed no independent orders and referred to its judgment in a companion appeal of even date for disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
������������������� ���������
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO-1945-2004 (O&M) United India Insurance Company ...Appellant Versus Kusum and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Argued by: Mr. D.K. Dogra, Advocate for appellant. Mr. Jashan Sekhon, Advocate with Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 5. Mr. Raghav Bali, Advocate for respondent – M/s Dharam Pal Satyapal Ltd. ****
Reserved on: 19.02.2026 Pronounced on: 23.02.2026 Pronounced fully/operative part: Fully
DEEPAK GUPTA, J.
For orders see, FAO-115-2005 titled as “Raja Ram vs. M/s
Dharam Pal Satyapal Ltd and others” of even date.
23.02.2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) Jiten JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:Yes/No Whether reportable:Yes/No
JITEN SHARMA 2026.02.24 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Raja Ram vs. M/s Dharam Pal Satyapal Ltd and othersReferred
FAO-115-2005, titled as "Raja Ram vs. M/s Dharam Pal Satyapal Ltd and others"
United India Insurance Company
Kusum
M/s Dharam Pal Satyapal Ltd
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
