Appellant absent and no representative appeared to confirm whether the appeal would be pursued. The court disposed of the appeal with liberty to revive it if she wishes to pursue it or a cause survives, along with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
269
FAO-1379-2019 (O&M) Date of decision: February 2nd , 2026
Shivani
...Appellant
Versus
Harmesh Kumar and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL
Present: None for the appellant.
Mr. Sanjiv Kumar, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2.
VIKAS BAH L, J. (ORAL)
February 2nd , 2026 (VIKAS BAHL) Puneet JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No
PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.02.03 14:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Shivani
Harmesh Kumar
Vikas Bahl
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
