Kulwant Kaur Vs Jatinder Sigh and Ors.

This is an appeal filed by the appellant/claimant, for seeking enhancement of compensation, awarded by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, on account of death of her son-Jaskaran Singh, in a motor vehicular accident, which took place on 19.11.2014.

¶17

Counsel for the appellant submits that he does not dispute about the extent of earnings of the deceased, as worked upon by learned Tribunal. Also, he does not dispute about the ‘future prospects’ and the ‘multiplier’, as assessed by learned Tribunal. At this stage, he confines his prayer, only for enhancement to be made, on the count of ‘loss of consortium’, which has not been awarded to the appellant/claimant.

¶18

SONU 2026.03.10 09:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

¶19

2

¶20

FAO-1007-2019

¶21

Counsel for the parties heard.

¶22

So far as, the age of the deceased is concerned, he was 19 years old, at the relevant time of accident and this fact is not disputed by the parties. Also, from the evidence brought on record, it is evident that the deceased was working at ‘Bharat Petroleum Petrol Pump’, Chaklan, Rupnagar. Suffice to consider the testimony of PW-2, Rajesh Kumar, Salesman, who proved salary certificate of the deceased as PW-2/A, which reveals about the earnings of the deceased to be Rs.7,850/-. This fact is also not disputed by the counsel for the Insurance Company. Taking it to be so, the compensation was worked upon by learned Tribunal, which is

¶23

reproduced in tabular form, as herein:-

¶24

Earnings assessed(monthly)	Rs. 7,850/-
Earnings(annual)	Rs. 94,200/-(7,850 x 12)
Future Prospect(40%)	Rs. 37,680/-
Total income(annual)	Rs.1,31,880/-(94,200 + 37,680)
Deduction (1/2) (considering the	Rs. 65,940/- (1,31,880/2)
marital status of the deceased)
Loss of dependency (Annual)	Rs. 65,940/-
Multiplier applied(18)	Rs. 11,86,920/-(65,940 x 18)
Funeral expenses	Rs. 15,000/-
Loss of Estate	Rs. 15,000/-
Total	Rs. 12,16,920/-

¶25

Also, interest of 7% per annum, was granted on the awarded

¶26

amount. The liability fastened upon the respondents was joint and several.

¶27

Also, it came forth that before learned Tribunal, the appellant/claimant-Kulwant Kaur, was divorced wife of Gurpreet Singh, who had been impleaded as proforma respondent. Considering the said marital status of the mother of the deceased and also considering about

¶28

SONU 2026.03.10 09:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

¶29

3

¶30

FAO-1007-2019

¶31

Gurpreet Singh, proforma respondent, to be not dependent upon the deceased-Jaskaran Singh, he was held to be not entitled to any compensation.

¶32

Considering the ‘work on’ of compensation aforesaid, it is pertinent to mention that no amount has been awarded on the count of ‘loss of consortium’. As such, on appraisal of the salary certificate, which had come on record as Ex.PW-2/A, which is not disputed by the counel for the appellant, the compensation do not call for further enhancement on any other count, except on the count of ‘loss of consortium’. On this count, the amount payable, as per ‘ National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Pranay Sethi and others’ 2017(4) RCR (Civil) 1009 , is Rs.48,400/-.

¶33

As such, the appellant is entitled to enhanced amount of Rs.48,400/- . The enhanced amount shall be payable by the Insurance Company, within a period of 45 days. On the enhanced amount, the appellant shall be held liable to the interest @ 7% per annum, from the date of filing of the appeal. In case of any default on the part of the Insurance Company, to make the payment in the given period, it shall be liable to pay penal interest @ 8% per annum, till realization.

¶34

(ARCHANA PURI) 09.03.2026 JUDGE Himanshu Vats

¶35

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶36

SONU 2026.03.10 09:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

Kulwant Kaur v. Jatinder Sigh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kulwant Kaur v. Jatinder Sigh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunita Vs Karambir

Kuljinder Kaur Vs Gursewak Singh and Another

Hafeejan & Ors. Vs Bhavay Tayal and Ors.

Shree Bawa Lal Dyal Sabha Partap Bagh Jalandhar Vs Pujari Chottan Dass and Anr.

Mukesh Devi Alias Mukesh Vs Deepak

Geetika Alias Geetika Narula Vs Deepak Narula