Court directed respondent No.1, Commissioner Ambala Cantt, to decide the pending revision petition within three weeks. State counsel assured no coercive steps would be taken pending disposal.
Direction to decide the pending revision petition within three weeks from the date of order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
116
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-9467-2026 (O&M) ` Date of Decision : 30.03.2026
Rajpal Since (deceased) through LRs ... Petitioners Versus
Commissioner, Ambala Cantt. and Others ... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI
Present : Ms. Anjali Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
JITENDER KUMAR 2026.03.31 11:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. High Court, Chandigarh
CWP-9467-2026
-2-
accordance with the law. He further assures the Court that till such time as the revision is not decided, no coercive steps would be taken against the petitioners.
( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE
30.03.2026 ( RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI ) jk JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
JITENDER KUMAR 2026.03.31 11:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. High Court, Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a direction can be issued to dispose of the pending revision petition within a time-bound manner while proceedings for execution are continuing.
Rajpal Since (deceased) through LRs
Commissioner, Ambala Cantt.
Alka Sarin
Ramesh Chander Dimri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
