The petitioner requested possession of property under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. The respondents assured that the application would be decided and possession handed over within four weeks. Consequently, the petitioner did not wish to press the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
113
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-9407-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 02.04.2026
M/S AXIS BANK LTD. …. Petitioner
VERSUS
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AMRITSAR AND ANR …. Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI
Present : Mr. Vijiyesh Malhotra, Advocate and Mr. Udai Yushvir Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Addl. AG Punjab and Mr. Akhil Kamra, AAG Punjab for the respondents.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
AMAN JAIN 2026.04.06 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
-2-
CWP-9407-2026 (O&M)
disposed off.
(ALKA SARIN) JUDGE
(RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI) 02.04.2026 JUDGE Aman Jain
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No
AMAN JAIN 2026.04.06 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition should be pressed for adjudication or disposed of?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S AXIS BANK LTD.
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AMRITSAR
ANR
ALKA SARIN
RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
