Piara Singh Alias Piara Singh Malhi Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

The instant writ petition impugns the order dated 27.11.2025 (Annexure P-4), vide which, the learned Additional District Magistratecum-Appellate Tribunal, Gurdaspur (respondent no.2), has dismissed the application for ejectment preferred by the petitioner (senior citizen), under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, (the Act of 2007).

¶13

During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the impugned order dated 27.11.2025 (Annexure P-4), has been passed by an authority devoid of statutory jurisdiction, and therefore, warrants interference on this ground alone.

¶14

Consequently, it is submitted that since the impugned order has not been passed by the statutory authority, i.e. District Magistrate, but by an authority exercising sub-delegated powers, i.e. Additional Deputy

¶15

DHARAM VIR 2026.04.20 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶16

CWP-9328-2026 -2-

¶17

Commissioner concerned, the same is liable to be set aside, being D elegatus non protest delegare .

¶18

Upon being pointedly asked, as to whether, under the statutory provisions, the District Magistrates/Presiding Officers of the Appellate Tribunals are competent to sub-delegate the quasi-judicial functions and powers vested in them by statute, learned State counsel fairly concedes that such functions and powers cannot be sub-delegated. Moreover, he has furnished a copy of the instructions dated 27.10.2025, issued by the Directorate Social Security and Women & Child Development, Punjab, wherethrough, it has been categorically clarified to all the concerned authorities that the District Magistrates/Presiding Officers of the Appellate Tribunals constituted under the Act of 2007 are not authorized to subdelegate their quasi-judicial functions and powers to any subordinate or other officer, irrespective of rank or competence. The relevant portion of the instructions is extracted hereunder:-

¶19

“ To

¶20

All District Magistrates/Presiding Officers, Appellate Tribunal Constituted under Sections 15(1) & 15(2) of The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.

¶21

No. P-3(SS)/2025/82189 Dated, Chandigarh 27-10-2025

¶22

Sub: Implementation of the Hon'ble High Court Order dated 26.09.2025 in CWP No. 27866 of 2025 - Davinder Singh vs. Additional District Magistrate & Others.

¶23

In continuation of this Department's Notification No. 8/10/2008-8SS/798 dated 27th August 2008, (Flag-A) whereby the District Magistrates were designated as Presiding Officers of the Appellate Tribunals constituted under The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, attention is invited to the recent directions issued by the Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh, in CWP No. 27866 of 2025 - Davinder Singh vs. Additional District Magistrate & Others decided on 26.09.2025. (Flag-B)

¶24

2. The Hon'ble Court has categorically clarified that the District Magistrates/Presiding Officers of the Appellate Tribunals constituted under the said Act are not authorized to sub-delegate their quasi-judicial functions and powers to any subordinate or other officer, irrespective of rank or competence.

¶25

DHARAM VIR 2026.04.20 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶26

CWP-9328-2026 -3-

¶27

3. Pursuant to the said judgment, the Office of the Worthy Chief Secretary to Government of Punjab, vide letter No.OSD(L)/CS/2025/64708997 dated 09.10.2025, (Flag-C) has directed that the above order be circulated to all concerned authorities for meticulous compliance.(Copy enclosed along with Hon'ble Court orders).

¶28

4. It is, therefore, requested to ensure strict and prompt compliance with the aforesaid directions of the Hon'ble High Court and the Chief Secretary's Office. It may further be ensured that a copy of these orders is circulated to all Sub-Divisional Magistrates under your jurisdiction for necessary action and adherence.

¶29

5. Non-compliance may attract adverse observations from the Hon'ble Court; therefore, the matter may be treated as Top Priority.

Encls. As above.”

****

“ Notification

Dated Chandigarh the 27^th August, 2008

¶34

In view of the Punjab Government Notification bearing No. 8/10/2008-8SS/542 dated 15.07.2008, and in exercise of powers conferred under Sections 7(1)&(2) and 15(1)&(2) of the Act of 2007, the Governor of Punjab constituted the Maintenance Tribunals/Appellate Tribunals, and their jurisdictions for the implementation of the Act ibid, as under:-

¶35

Sr. No.	Name of the Tribunal	Jurisdiction	Presiding Officer of the Tribunal
1.	_Maintenance Tribunal _	Sub Division of th District concerned	e Sub Divisional Mag- istrate of the area concerned
2.	Appellate Tribunal	District concerned	District Magistrate of the area con- cerned

¶36

In view of the abovesaid conceded position, the impugned

¶37

order does not pass the test of legality, and requires interference of this

¶38

Court. Consequently, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remitted to the District Magistrate-cum-Appellate Tribunal concerned, for adjudication afresh, in accordance with Section 16 of the Act of 2007. The Additional District Magistrate concerned, is directed to send the original record of the case to the District Magistrate-cum-Appellate Tribunal concerned.

¶39

DHARAM VIR 2026.04.20 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶40

CWP-9328-2026 -4-

¶41

All the parties concerned are directed to cause appearance before the District Magistrate-cum-Appellate Tribunal on 30.04.2026 at 11:00 AM, whereupon, the latter shall make an endeavour to decide the matter as expeditiously as possible, after affording adequate opportunity of hearing to all the parties.

¶42