Akal Group of Institutes and Another Vs State of Punjab and Others

The petitioners have filed the instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 06.09.2022 (P-2) and order dated 24.02.2026 (P-3) adjourning the matter to 13.07.2026. Further, seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing respondent No.6-

¶21

VINAY 2026.04.23 14:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

¶22

-2-

¶23

CWP-9021-2026 (O&M)

¶24

Educational Tribunal, Punjab to decide the petition No.99 of 2022 in an expeditious manner, if necessary by pre-poning the date of hearing from 13.07.2026 to some earlier date.

¶25

While issuing notice of motion on 25.03.2026, the following order was passed:-

¶26

“The petitioners have filed the instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 06.09.2022 (P-2) and order dated 24.02.2026 (P-3) adjourning the matter to 13.07.2026. Further, seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing respondent No.6-Educational Tribunal, Punjab to decide the petition No.99 of 2022 in an expeditious manner, if necessary by pre-poning the date of hearing from 13.07.2026 to some earlier date.

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, submits that the Management is ready to withdraw the charge-sheet dated 07.04.2022, as already stated before the Educational Tribunal vide order dated 09.05.2024 (P3 colly), and consequently, the petition filed by respondent No.5 before the Educational Tribunal shall become infructuous.

¶28

Notice of motion.

¶29

Mr. N.P.S. Hira, D.A.G., Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 & 6 and seeks time to get instructions.

¶30

Mr. Sanjeev Roy, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.4 and seeks time to file his power of attorney in the Registry.

¶31

Let notice be issued to respondent No.5, returnable on 02.04.2026.

¶32

Process ‘dasti’ only.

¶33

Additionally, respondent No.5 be served through Mr. Ish Puneet Singh, Advocate representing her before the Educational Tribunal.”

¶34

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

¶35

management shall withdraw the chargesheet dated 07.04.2022 within a

¶36

period of 02 weeks from today with liberty to issue fresh chargesheet, if

¶37

required, and in this view of the matter, the present petition as well as

¶38

VINAY 2026.04.23 14:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

¶39

-3-

¶40

CWP-9021-2026 (O&M)

¶41

the petition filed by respondent No.5 before the Educational Tribunal, Punjab, shall be rendered infructuous.

¶42

In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous and the same is disposed of accordingly.

¶43

However, it is made clear that the petitioners shall be bound by the statement made before this Court.

¶44

22.04.2026 ( NAMIT KUMAR ) Vinay JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶45

VINAY 2026.04.23 14:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

Akal Group of Institutes and Another v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akal Group of Institutes and Another v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parsanta Kamboj Vs the State of Punjab and Others

Simran Katyal Vs State of Punjab and Others

Rajinder Kumar and Others Vs State of Punjab and Others

Pargat Singh Vs State of Punjab ,Food Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs Department

Rashmi Kohli Vs the State of Punjab Aand Another

Sukhchain Kaur Vs State of Punjab