Oral order where counsel for the petitioner could not obtain instructions from the client. The petition was disposed of with liberty to revive if any cause survives.
Disposed with liberty to the petitioner to revive the petition if any cause survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
201
CWP-863-2001 Date of decision: 11.09.2026
Suresh Kumar
.....Petitioner
Versus
The State of Punjab and another
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR
Present : Mr. Tejveer Singh Saggu, Advocate and Mr. Harmandeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Tushar Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2-Bank.
NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL)
11.09.2026 ( NAMIT KUMAR ) Vinay JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
VINAY 2026.09.11 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Suresh Kumar
State of Punjab
Nimit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
