Ex parte oral order in two connected writ petitions challenging orders of punishment and recovery. The court disposed of the petitions reserving them for revival on demonstrating subsistence of the cause due to potential efflux of time.
Petitioner granted liberty to revive petitions by demonstrating cause still subsists.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
203 (2 case s ) Date of decision: 10.09.2026
CWP-7789 - 2001 (O & M) PARMINDER PAL SINGH VS THE HARYANA STATE AND OT H ERS
CWP-1462 6 -2001 (O & M) PARMINDER PAL SINGH VS THE STATE OF HARYANA AN D OTHERS
CORAM: H ON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMA N CHAUDHARY
Present : None for the petitioners.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
10.09.2026
parveen kumar
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
Whet h er speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whet h er reportable : Yes / No
PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.09.10 15:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Parminder Pal Singh
Haryana State
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
