Illegible-in-part judgment; only fragments recoverable. Legible portions indicate a writ proceeding invoking certiorari (¶14) relating to the empanelment of YOGESH s/o BALRAM SHARMA as Specialist Physiotherapist for UPHC Ashok Nagar, Fatehabad (upgraded as a polyclinic under the 15th Finance Commission) on a fixed incentive of Rs. 2,500 per visit. The judgment reproduces Clause 21(a) of the engagement terms (termination at any time without assigning reasons on one month's notice) and the declarant's undertaking (termination without notice; no regularisation/benefits/perks under NHM; validity up to 31/03/2026). It further quotes, as precedent and not as this Court's holding, the settled rule that a purely contractual contract of personal service is not specifically enforceable (section 14, Specific Relief Act 1963), subject to three exceptions (removal contrary to Articles 311/309; protected workmen under the Industrial Disputes Act 1947; statutory-body employees terminated in breach of mandatory statutory provisions). The term 'mala fides' survives in otherwise corrupt reasoning (¶39). Court, case number, bench, dates, framed issues, holdings and disposition could not be verified from the legible text.