Dismissed¶15

Ms Sidhi Vinayak Enterprises v. State of Punjab

Punjab & Haryana HC20 Jul 2026CWP/7078/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Sidhi Vinayak Enterprises v State of Punjab; CWP-7078-2026 (O&M); Punjab & Haryana High Court; decided 20.07.2026 (oral judgment). Keywords: DRC-01A notice; DRC-01 yet to be issued; opportunity to respondent to reply and clarify factual inconsistency; writ petition dismissed at threshold stage without entertaining grounds; pending applications disposed accordingly. No statutes or precedents cited in the judgment text.

What did the court decide?

Since the impugned communication is only a notice in the form of DRC-01A and DRC-01 is yet to be issued, it remains open to the petitioner to respond to such notice and clarify the factual inconsistency, if any. ¶13

Ms Sidhi Vinayak Enterprises Vs State of Punjab — Punjab & Haryana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

133

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

CWP-7078-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20^th July, 2026.

¶4

M/S. SIDHI VINAYAK ENTERPRISES .…...Petitioner(s)

¶5

V/s

¶6

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .. ....Respondent(s)

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR

¶8

Present Mr. Aman Bansal, Advocate and

¶9

Ms. Anjali Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶10

Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. A.G., Punjab.

¶11

¶12

ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral)

¶13

1. Considering the fact that the impugned communication is only a notice issued to the petitioner in the form of DRC-01A and DRC-01 is yet to be issued, it is always open to the petitioner to respond to the such notice and clarify the factual inconsistency, if any.

¶14

2. At this stage, we are not required to entertain the present Writ Petition on the grounds set up therein, and the Writ Petition stands

¶15

dismissed , accordingly.

¶16

3. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly.

¶17

[ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA]

¶18

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

¶19

[ROHIT KAPOOR] JUDGE

¶20

July 20, 2026

¶21

Ess Kay
	Whether speaking / reasoned	: Yes	/ No
	Whether Reportable	: Yes	/ No

¶22

SURESH KUMAR 2026.07.21 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Ms Sidhi Vinayak Enterprises v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ms Sidhi Vinayak Enterprises v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bala Ji Enterprises Vs Union of India and Others

Dharambir Singh Vs Union of India through Revenue Secretary at Ministry of Finance

Sheesh Pal Vs State of Punjab and Others

M/S Deepak Garments Vs State of Haryana and Others

Ms Aashi Construction Company Vs State of Haryana and Others

Green Image Greenland Private Limited Vs Excise and Taxation Officer, Ward 5, Rewari and Anr.